Case Summary
- Date/Time: Around 3 PM on a weekday (just before rush hour)
- Road Structure: 4-lane highway, speed limit 65 mph (approx. 105 km/h)
- Weather/Road Condition: Clear weather, dry road surface
Sequence of Events
1. Vehicle A (a sedan) was traveling in the 3rd lane (second from the right) at around 65–70 mph.
2. The driver of Vehicle A, upon encountering slower traffic ahead, attempted to change lanes to the 2nd lane without using a turn signal.
3. Vehicle B (an SUV) was already traveling steadily in the 2nd lane at around 75 mph. It was in close proximity to where Vehicle A was attempting to merge.
4. As Vehicle A suddenly merged into the path of Vehicle B, the latter applied its brakes but was unable to avoid the collision. The front of Vehicle B collided with the rear side of Vehicle A.
Aftermath
- Both vehicles moved to the shoulder and stopped.
- No major injuries were reported, but the front of Vehicle B was damaged and required towing.
- Both drivers reported the accident to their respective insurers.
- Dashcam footage from Vehicle B was recovered and submitted.
Fault
1. Fault of Vehicle A:
- Failure to signal
- Unsafe lane change
- Insufficient gap for merging
2. Fault of Vehicle B:
- Speeding (10 mph over the limit)
- Whether the collision could have been avoided
Conclusion
- Vehicle A was primarily at fault for making an unsafe lane change without signaling.
- Vehicle B was found to be slightly at fault for speeding.
- Dashcam analysis showed Vehicle B’s reaction time was 0.7 seconds, indicating no reasonable chance of avoidance.
Liability Apportionment
- Vehicle A: 80% at fault
- Vehicle B: 20% at fault
→ Vehicle A’s insurance company was held responsible for 80% of Vehicle B’s repair costs.
→ Vehicle B’s driver would have 20% contributory negligence if filing a personal injury claim.
Key Evidence
- Dashcam footage from Vehicle B clearly showing the lane change
- Traffic CCTV partially capturing the merging movement
- Forensic report analyzing speed and impact angle